In this post, I am going to focus on the after part of the image taking- editing.
I equate photography to painting a wall- no one sees all the extra effort it takes to get everything done. They only see the end result- a nicely painted wall. Same with photography- no one sees all the work it took to get that one photo, they only see that one resulting photo.
Still, I wasn't getting the same quality of images as I saw in other places. Why not? Had to be the camera, right? I know differently now, but I instead got a better camera and things got slightly better. But that was because of the tech in place, I still had to take the photos and self edit. I would always, incorrectly, assume that ONE photo would always get what I wanted to show off what I wanted to share.
The biggest mental break for me was that I could self edit the results for others to see. I was attempting to get everything perfect in ONE shot, instead I realized that I could take several shots and only show/share the one I liked. Fantastic. With digital, I could load up as much as possible. Memory is cheap, storage is cheap. Off I went. Snapping happily with my new knowledge that I can control which images people see. Yet, something was still not working out.
Then I read about editing software- basic stuff like cropping and removing red eye. Easy enough. I hate spending too much time in front of the computer if I could help it. Photoshop was more of a photo-creation suite of software for me. (plus it was expensive!) I started to use free software. I switched between Google's Picasa and Canon's Digital Professional Pro softwares. I still refused to do much with the image other than the basics. I wanted to keep the image as unedited as possible. I liked to stay true to the scene. The quality was getting better, but I was still lacking that refined image to share that I wanted.
The next breakthrough was Adobe's Lightroom software. I read about how it was for photographers and did work flows. It could even create a gallery and upload to an FTP site. Oh wow, cool. I downloaded and tried, a little complicated. However it allowed to do keywords, sorting, and various other neat features I liked.
The power of editing was brought home by watching the Lynda.com training done by Chris Orwig. I was completely smitten. I felt like I could do anything in that package now... without taking 30 minutes per photo. I was jumping in on the ground floor of the software, so everyone was learning at the same time... and I loved it all.
My editing flow now goes something like this: import images with keywords, quick select of ones I like by rating, filter images by rating, re-scan for things I did not see, white balance photos, crop, tweak levels, minor edits like spot removal, final check of images, export via extra filters with watermarks, upload to flickr. A vastly different process than deleting on the first point and shoot I had. Now I don't even typically look at the images on my camera unless I am checking the levels of the images.
The one image I may share usually has more than 9 other images that I did not now. Thats on a good day.
Very cool. I'm followed a lot of this EXACT same progression. I'm on this step:". I wanted to keep the image as unedited as possible. I liked to stay true to the scene. The quality was getting better, but I was still lacking that refined image to share that I wanted." I've bought and barely understood Photoshop Elements 8. It's daunting. I've used it to whiten some teeth and clear up a slightly blurry picture but for the most part it's collecting dust. Guess I should start taking the editing process more seriously. :0)
ReplyDelete